It is often said that no two people are exactly the same. At the same time, it is also true that most children have a lot in common, whether it be the stages of cognitive development, generational social trends, or cultural thinking patterns. And it is on this very basis that teachers teach diverse classrooms as a single unit. While modifications per student are provided as needed, differentiation takes a back seat to the homogeneous modeling, scaffolding, skill-mastering and assessing that characterizes the bulk of what takes place in the classroom.
However, as the world shrinks and
multicultural communities form in urban areas, schools invariably
become increasingly diverse. Teachers are continually challenged to
teach larger groups of students who give the impression of uniformity
– whether due to age, dress code, or trends in language and
behaviorisms – while in fact significant differences only multiply.
As these differences become more apparent over time, educators
determine whether to group students by specific characteristics –
academic competence, language fluency, cultural background, special
needs – or to let the chips fall where they may.
The landmark ruling in Brown v.
Board of Education of Topeka, KS emphasized that the
desegregation of public schools would be a great boon to the American
education system. The natural interaction between students despite
their differences results is academically beneficial, as research and
reason both demonstrate.
Sadly, diversity can also be attempted
thoughtlessly and may easily result in depressed education standards
and increased conflict between distinct communities. The story of
Erin Gruwell and her LA-based "Freedom Writers" is a case
in point. Woodrow Wilson High School in Long Beach implemented a
voluntary integration program that only aggravated the high level of
tension between the African-American, Asian, White and Latino
neighborhoods.
Social engineering carries inherent
risks and must be executed carefully. Educators must be prudent not
to promote students of different backgrounds in a way that reduces
individual children to certain characteristics, whether sexual
orientation, ethnic heritage, or learning style. Healthy interaction
between diverse student groups demands equality, unity, and an
environment where intimate peer relationships may be developed
safely.
At Santa Fe South High School in
Oklahoma City, for example, a complex urban environment coupled with
ethnic prejudices results in a unique situation that requires care
and attention. The Latino demographic in Oklahoma City and
southwestern United States generally is one that experiences social,
and recently legal, prejudice, due to the ongoing complications of
illegal immigration and related issues. SFS HS is predominantly
Hispanic, with about 10% African-American and 10% White. These
minorities, while economically and socially dominant (the former
clearly less so) as a national ethnicity, now experience a turning of
the tables on campus. Strained relations between these groups create
ongoing prejudice on campus, but due to the clear dominance of the
Latino community, conflict is minimal. Every school experiences its
own issues relating to diversity and no educator has the privilege of
ignoring its relevance to the success or failure of public education.
The classroom teacher must understand
and sympathize with these larger population trends if he or she is to
create a venue where diversity can be expressed and embraced in the
context of a broader and singular vision. And the same rules apply in
the case of any significant student groupings. If students of
different academic levels, for example, are to work together
productively and safely, teachers must address the prejudiced
treatment of students, whether by themselves or by other students.
Different expectations for stronger or weaker students will not
foster resentment or embarrassment if the teacher clearly articulates
a common vision of growing in skill and knowledge of the subject
matter. If the student's goal is to get a certain grade, and the
teacher expects more of one student than another to get the same
grade, then equality in assessment is lost, and the students will not
trust the teacher, nor will they build healthy, intimate
relationships with each other. However, if a growth model is adopted
and students are consistently assessed on the basis of individual
growth, equality is maintained.
Indeed, successful diversity in public
education is the best way to prepare our children to continue the
American democratic tradition, to be responsible global citizens, and
to let their world grow beyond the locality in which they were born.
No comments:
Post a Comment